The U.S. Supreme Court seems inclined to reject President Donald Trump’s effort to immediately oust Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook.

COLUMBUS, Ohio — The Ohio Supreme Court ordered the state to pay nursing homes up to $1 billion. Four months later, the money still hasn’t arrived. In September, the court unanimously settled a dispute over how Ohio calculates Medicaid payments meant to reward high-quality nursing homes.

The US Supreme Court is dashing any hopes of a quick rollback of President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

By Jan Wolfe WASHINGTON, Jan 24 (Reuters) - U.S. Supreme Court justices appear reluctant to grant President Donald Trump's request to let him immediately remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. But their eventual ruling following this week's arguments in the case may not give Cook a sweeping victory.

California Republicans filed an emergency appeal to the U.S.

Department of Justice asks Supreme Court to block California's congressional map, alleging the state improperly factored race into redistricting under Proposition 50.

The timing of the court’s decision has been the subject of much speculation and anticipation. But now it may not land for at least several more weeks.

The Supreme Court on Thursday gave California Democrats a week to respond to the California Republican Party’s request to block the new Democrat-drawn congressional district maps from being used in November.

The Trump administration wants the authority to fire Lisa Cook, a Federal Reserve governor. Experts say that would undermine the independence of the central bank.

Last year, a federal appeals court set aside the awards to USAA after determining some of its patents on technology for depositing checks remotely were invalid.

The justices were alert to the central bank’s crucial role and wary of issuing a broad ruling based on rushed briefing and incomplete information.

The Supreme Court of the United States is weighing a series of important cases including mail-in ballots in Mississippi.