In his concurring opinion, Justice Gorsuch noted that the law serves a compelling interest ... according to new research from Blue Hour... L&C Bio (CEO Hwan-Chul Lee) has achieved a significant ...

President Donald Trump has arrived in Los Angeles to tour the wildfire devastation there. Earlier in the day, he suggested at ...

In a concurring opinion, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote, "Whether this law will succeed in achieving its ends, I do ...

An icon in the shape of a lightning bolt. Impact Link The US Supreme Court on Friday upheld a law that could soon ban TikTok. While its decision — that the divest-or-ban law does not violate the ...

Justice Neil Gorsuch detailed his reasoning in his Supreme Court opinion for voting to uphold the TikTok ban in the U.S. This ...

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch expressed concerns Friday that the divest-or-ban law targeting TikTok might not “achieve ...

Justice Gorsuch wrote a brief concurring, joined by Justice Thomas: Sometimes, the Constitution or Congress provides a particular standard of proof. See ante, at 4–5. If not, courts must find one.

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has expressed concerns about the limited time to deliberate on the Supreme Court unanimously voting Friday to uphold the government's impending TikTok ban.

and to a lesser extent Justice Kavanaugh, have ruled against Trump, and conservative positions more broadly, in contrast with Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch. I've made this point in more ...